09 Jan 2010 @ 11:38 PM
Whole Life Insurance vs Social Security — Galveston
Did you know that in 1983 congress changed the laws so that other counties could not copy what Galveston had done 2 years earlier. Galveston County (like a few others before it) pulled out of the Social Security system because they found a safer and more flexible and lucrative way, for the average person, to save for retirement.
Is this blatant proof that congress does not make decisions based on what is best for the people of the United States of America? Yes it is.
Some may say that they did so because Whole Life Insurance was not good. It has been given a bad name and a bad wrap from the financial guru’s but that is because they either 1. Do not look at it’s value, only it’s cost 2. do not understand how to use it properly and/or 3. they are receiving cash to educate the public in a certain way.
Read here a report after 24 years of using this system how whole life insurance has far out paced what social security would be offering these same people, had they not opted to get out of the system.
Of course, if regular old whole life can outweigh the benefits of social security, imagine what a specific whole life policy that has been designed with certain riders to increase the cash value and the tax advantaged growth to the supercharge level could do for your retirement.
If you want predictability, guarantees, security and tax advantages in your retirement; while providing an emergency fund and loan provisions for personal or business ventures through out your life, all with the same money, contact me today — Jennifer @ 845 – 649-7487
Tags: congress, galveston, galveston county, lucrative, RETIREMENT, social security, tax advantages, whole life insurance
Categories: RETIREMENT, Whole Life vs Social Security
Categories: RETIREMENT, Whole Life vs Social Security
Categories
Tag Cloud
Blog RSS
Comments RSS
Last 50 Posts
Back
Void 
Life 
Earth 
Wind 
Water 
Fire